Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 6, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Moderator <Moderator@wsj.com> wrote:
Dear Ms. Troy,
Thank you for agreeing to comply with the Community rules. We will provisionally reinstate you so that you are able to comment on WSJ stories again.
Please keep in mind that the rules we would especially like you to observe include the following, in regards to posting links to outside sites/blogs:
* You will not upload, post or submit anything that is obscene or contains profanity or veiled profanity or that may be hateful or offensive on racial, ethnic, sexual, stereotypical or any other grounds; is harmful, vulgar or distasteful; or is defamatory, libelous, or invades another person's privacy or proprietary rights.
* Comments with self-promotional links are not allowed. Such links are permitted on your Community profile page.
* Excessive links to external web sites, comments in all capital letters, all-bold or all-italic postings, excessive blank space and objectionable profile photos are not permitted.
* You will not upload, post or submit or otherwise make available any content that contains links to web sites with objectionable content.
You are indeed correct that we ask that commenters use their real names; please do flag those comments if you suspect a real name is not being used.
We do reserve the right to remove any content at any time from the Journal Community, as is stated at the bottom of the Community rules page.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Moderator
WSJ.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Suzannah Troy [mailto:suzannahbtroy@me.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 5:03 PM
To: Moderator; Victoria.chen@dowjones.com
Subject: Re: unless apology and change lawsuit is coming and I continue to ask for the identity of the moderator and all involved
Sir or Madame. I believe I have. I would like to be restored.
If not I am busy caring for my Mom who became incapacitated and I have helped her with basic needs like getting to the toilet without falling and just made sure she got sub-acute rehabilitation that will give us time to move her to assisted living.
The upset you inflicted on me caused me to miss a call from her neurologist who telephone on a number I did not recognize.
I do not want to to sue the Wall Street Journal gave me a great honor publishing my letter Petrella Ground Zero but I will because I did not violate any community guidelines by speaking from my own personal experience that I believe is pertinent for all New Yorkers and everybody in New York but is been a victim of police abuses him so if need be I will go to court and we can let a judge decide whether you've discriminated against me.
I am happy to show any judge many comments on the Wall Street Journal website that are violating community guidelines starting with first they are not using their real names that alone I'm going to show them as well as many comments that I believe are thoughtless I believe my comments have a lot of thought and a lot of passion just like the letter that was published by the Wall Street Journal that started out talking about my personal feelings my personal issues and I have that right when making comments. My personal frame of reference is valid and I believe it speaks to a world community that is that has concerns about abuses of power whether it's the please department or the political figure and so I believe I'm I have been within my rights and within the community and I've been a long-term member of this community the Wall Street Journal community so I disagree that I've violated anything and I'm asking that I be given back my position that I was wrongly punished and if not then after I take care of my mother I will be filing a lawsuit against you and any supervisor that allows this to go on I'm going to file a lawsuit I promise you and less this is rectified thank you.
Suzannah Troy
Sent from my iPhoneOn Mar 6, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Moderator <Moderator@wsj.com> wrote:Dear Ms. Troy,Please review our Community rules (again, the link is http://online.wsj.com/community/faq#openId=3). If you feel you can comply with the rules, we will provisionally restore your privileges. As always, we encourage you to report as abuse any comments that you feel violate our rules.Sincerely,ModeratorWSJ.com-----Original Message-----From: Suzannah B. Troy [mailto:suzannahbtroy@me.com]Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 2:41 PMTo: Victoria.chen@dowjones.com; ModeratorSubject: unless apology and change lawsuit is coming and I continue to ask for the identity of the moderator and all involvedI spoke to the intermediary CEO's office and they are looking into it but here is an FYI if you don't right this wrong I will tell the Judge in a lawsuit that The WSJ commenting section is like a public space open to all but I am being exclude due to discrimination and bias and this is the 2nd case by the WSJ so there is a pattern here.I can show the Judge countless examples of violation of guidelines but the reason given for me to be suspended is not valid and I will show the Judge my letter published in the WSJ that starts with my personal experience and I am allowed to use that in speaking up, expressing my thoughts on behalf of how many New Yorkers that feel they way I do...plenty.I promise you I am not shy about filing a lawsuit. I will show the Judge every effort I made to not do so via phone calls, emails and even a YouTube I posted.If the moderator stands behind his or hers actions my I know the moderators names. Either way I continue to ask for the moderator's name to post on my blog and name in a lawsuit I will file if this suspension is not lifted.I have posted comments for years and never had a problem until I will tell the Judge I was recently discriminated by the WSJ and Neil Lipshlutz rectified that abuse of power, discrimination and bias.Thank you,Suzannah B. Troy