I have proof evidence that I gave the DA my address yet they don't have it and you can hear them tell me they did a thorough investigation when in fact they don't even know they had my address.
The DA tells me they sent me a FedEx yet they don't have my signature FedEx says it was never sent FedEx asked for a tracking number. Joan Illuzi and Tiana Walton refuse to give me tracking number. If you're doing a thorough investigation and thorough job and you're honest why the secrecy and why didn't you get a signature when you request my signature and they did not do that and they refused to give me the tracking number for FedEx. I believe they wanted to inflict as much suffering as possible as a form of retaliation from being a whistleblower.
It's the Cult of Cy.
If the Manhattan DA had done the criminal investigation a thorough one and a prosecution of 911 crooks in 2012 as John Liu requested maybe Ariel Russo would be alive? See John Liu's press release from may 30, 2012. Scott Stringer removed that you press releases one called CityTime 2 and the other the tax payers pockets pics he called for criminal investigation.
Mike Sachs analyst Michelle refuses to give me the name of the man who had the job before Mike Sachs which is public information so why the secrecy and she doesn't want me to have her last name and frankly I don't want to first name I prefer her last name.
From the DA to NYPD to internal affairs it's systematic corruption a failure to train and supervise properly as well as retaliation and dirty dirty politics fixing in favors.
My constitutional rights violated.
Coercion is a crime not to policing tool.
Title 18 subsection 242 Conspiracy of Rights?
I'm not stopping with lawsuit number two if need be I will testify in front of the U.S. Senate and gather together people for new commission into police internal affairs and DA corruption until the city of New York takes responsibility.
I'm also alleging that by Scott Stringer brokering a deal that Cy Vance cleared the way for an department of investigation it protected hewlett-Packard stock board members appointed to the New York City pension board that are Hewlett-Packard biggies as well as possible New York State and New York City government investments and Hewlett Packard as just one example.
(I'm even suggesting a form of stock manipulation by preventing criminal prosecution it protected the stocks of major companies actually had employees over billing. I'm alleging the possibility that New York state and city also have investments in the stocks an example of Hewlett-Packard actually have Biggies appointed to the pension board.)
I have a long list of why the NYPD Internal Affairs would retaliate against me but add me posting Eric Garner's and written the lawsuit from seven years ago to the list.
DVD handing in does not include the video of me calling department of investigation had Mark peters refers me to internal affairs and inspector general for the NYPD so far done nothing about 911 my allegations that in fact it was absolutely criminal behavior it was criminal activity as well as graft.
