Village Independent Democrats Honoring a corrupt little rag - even if not corrupt is it ethical?

On a darkly humorous note, what if the republican national party did the same with The New York Time?

I have an aggravated harassment complaint against Lincoln Anderson who sent me a barrage of emails after I asked him to stop contacting me -- not the first time and the emails went on for hours.

My YouTubes exposed The Villager and NYU working to turn
away so many New Yorkers that wanted to gain access to the Quinn Kurland Derr debate and so many seniors were turned away yet Quinn's supporters all got to front of the line some how! Go to YouTube- search NYU Villager,

Anderson also slandered me and an African American woman 56 poverty level mental ill and falsely accuses of extortion because the poor woman asked Anderson's friend and ex- employee for money because he photographed her so much over the years and so she asked for money. PAL, MoMa and many other ask me for money but when a poverty level African American asks for money it is extortion. Anderson protected his ex workers right to photograph this ill high woman topless as his friend had done before known for taking photos of homeless people even states of nakedness or urinating.


Classy guys but the big question besides ethics is how could anyone in the Democratic party award a little rag that endorsed Mike Bloomberg and his mini me Christine Quinn.

The Villager and Chelsea Now removed an article pre the election on City Council Task force meeting on DOB but Quinn did not want to face a huge room of anti Trump Spring and Varrick Protestors so she had James Oddo chair it. I rockednthe house that might with my speech


Explain endorsing Bloomberg Quinn and any democrat rewarding a newspaper that endorsed them?