Thursday, June 11, 2015
Joe Tacopina Hated His Mini-me Bikini Dina Nesheiwat Chad Venus Fly Trap Seigel Trying to Wiggle out of Jane Doe Lawsuit
http://suzannahbtroy.blogspot.com/2015/06/joe-tacopina-mini-mes-bikini-dina.html?m=1
Sent to me by fan of my blog:
"It is hard for me to say but had Mr. Parlatore simply followed the court rules to remind the Judge of the age of the pending motions was beyond the 60-day rule (See attached) he would not be in this position of allowing Dina and Chad to file a Motion to Dismiss. They would have been included under the arm of the pending Motions. If Mr. Parlatore followed the rules, he would have been obligated to notify Judge Kenney, the one who the NYC Bar Association did not give a seal of approval to. Now, I see a rat squirming in a dark alley way looking for the escape hole. Maybe Mr. Parlatore sent the letter but I doubt it. Lawyers always know so much more than the public.... I hope Tim resurfaces soon and grabs the rat by its ears and takes this on hard. This is exactly why every rat loop-hole must be closed from the start because this is the garbage worming that you get. Even if the Motion to Dismiss isn't heard, at this time, it may cause prejudice with the
Judge and wiggle in arguments that should have been sealed off months ago by the submission motions being delayed. I warned your readers that Judge Kenney was delaying way too long and seemingly doesn't know how to rule on simple topics. Your readers know this and maybe the other side is reading your posts - I don't know - but there appears to be a mess brewing here and I knew these delays and the silence way a ploy to lull the plaintiffs into thinking the Court had this under control when, well, read the comments on Judge Kenney and wonder why she is taking a half of year with no end in sight to make a simple judicial determination. Maybe she needs a less stressful job. Let's go Judge Kenney!
(if 60 day rules followed pending motions should ( in my humble non legal opinion) have been decided by or around Feb 17, 2015 and March 15, 2015 respectively. Now, the defendants have offered a motion with 2 others in limbo and no end in sight! This is nonsense and unfair to the parties and public all waiting in tow...come Judge, get the lead out - this is why statutes of limitations also get blown)"
Sent from my iPhone
Sent to me by fan of my blog:
"It is hard for me to say but had Mr. Parlatore simply followed the court rules to remind the Judge of the age of the pending motions was beyond the 60-day rule (See attached) he would not be in this position of allowing Dina and Chad to file a Motion to Dismiss. They would have been included under the arm of the pending Motions. If Mr. Parlatore followed the rules, he would have been obligated to notify Judge Kenney, the one who the NYC Bar Association did not give a seal of approval to. Now, I see a rat squirming in a dark alley way looking for the escape hole. Maybe Mr. Parlatore sent the letter but I doubt it. Lawyers always know so much more than the public.... I hope Tim resurfaces soon and grabs the rat by its ears and takes this on hard. This is exactly why every rat loop-hole must be closed from the start because this is the garbage worming that you get. Even if the Motion to Dismiss isn't heard, at this time, it may cause prejudice with the
Judge and wiggle in arguments that should have been sealed off months ago by the submission motions being delayed. I warned your readers that Judge Kenney was delaying way too long and seemingly doesn't know how to rule on simple topics. Your readers know this and maybe the other side is reading your posts - I don't know - but there appears to be a mess brewing here and I knew these delays and the silence way a ploy to lull the plaintiffs into thinking the Court had this under control when, well, read the comments on Judge Kenney and wonder why she is taking a half of year with no end in sight to make a simple judicial determination. Maybe she needs a less stressful job. Let's go Judge Kenney!
(if 60 day rules followed pending motions should ( in my humble non legal opinion) have been decided by or around Feb 17, 2015 and March 15, 2015 respectively. Now, the defendants have offered a motion with 2 others in limbo and no end in sight! This is nonsense and unfair to the parties and public all waiting in tow...come Judge, get the lead out - this is why statutes of limitations also get blown)"
Sent from my iPhone